Comparison

Kognitos vs UiPath

UiPath automates screens. Kognitos automates processes. See why enterprises are replacing brittle drag-and-drop bots with hallucination-free AI automation in plain English.

Book a Demo View All Comparisons
Head-to-Head

Next-gen AI automation
vs. legacy drag-and-drop RPA.

Head-to-head comparison of Kognitos vs UiPath across enterprise automation dimensions
Dimension Kognitos UiPath
Approach English as Code — natural language Drag & drop visual scripting
Target User Business users (no developers needed) RPA developers, IT teams
AI Architecture Neurosymbolic AI: deterministic + learning Rule-based bots; AI add-ons (Document Understanding)
Knowledge Capture Living SOPs — tribal knowledge captured and refined None — knowledge stays in developer scripts
Hallucination Risk Zero — neurosymbolic, process-oriented N/A — deterministic but brittle
Self-Healing Auto-adapts; learns from human guidance Breaks on any UI change; manual fixes required
Governance Built-in audit trail, explainability, regression testing ~ Enterprise tier only (limited)
Time to Value Days (minutes with pre-built workflows) Weeks to months
Maintenance Cost Minimal — self-healing, no developer dependency High — dedicated RPA CoE required
Best For Complex back-office automation at scale Structured, unchanging screen-scraping tasks
Key Differences

Why enterprises choose Kognitos
over UiPath.

Business Users Build Automations

UiPath requires trained RPA developers who use a visual designer to script bot interactions. Kognitos lets the people who know the process — finance analysts, operations managers, compliance officers — build and modify automations by describing them in plain English. No code, no developer bottleneck.

Self-Healing vs. Break-and-Fix

UiPath bots break every time a UI element changes — a button moves, a field is renamed, an application updates. Each break requires a developer to diagnose and fix. Kognitos's patented Process Refinement Engine resolves exceptions automatically, encoding every fix permanently. 90% of exceptions are auto-resolved after their first occurrence.

Institutional Knowledge Captured

With UiPath, process knowledge stays locked in developer-owned scripts and individual expertise. When people leave, knowledge walks out the door. Kognitos captures tribal knowledge as living SOPs — documented, AI-refined, continuously improving automations that belong to the organization, not to individuals.

12× Lower Maintenance Cost

UiPath enterprises typically maintain a dedicated RPA Center of Excellence with multiple developers to keep bots running. Kognitos eliminates this overhead entirely — self-healing automations, no UI-dependent scripts, no developer dependency. Enterprises report 12× lower ongoing maintenance costs.

0%
Hallucination rate
12×
Lower maintenance vs. UiPath
90%
Exceptions auto-resolved
10×
Faster to production

The Verdict

UiPath works for simple, structured tasks that never change. For complex, mission-critical back-office automation at enterprise scale — where processes evolve, exceptions are the norm, and governance is non-negotiable — Kognitos is the clear choice.

See Kognitos in Action
FAQ

Kognitos vs UiPath
common questions.

For complex, mission-critical back-office automation, Kognitos offers significant advantages over UiPath: zero hallucination risk via neurosymbolic AI, self-healing automations that learn from exceptions, English as Code that business users can build and audit without developers, and 12× lower maintenance costs. UiPath may still be suitable for simple, structured, unchanging screen-scraping tasks.
Yes. Kognitos connects to 130+ enterprise systems and can automate the same processes as UiPath. Many enterprises run Kognitos alongside existing RPA before full migration. Business users describe their processes in plain English, and Kognitos builds the automation through conversation — no code rewrite required.
UiPath has added AI features (Document Understanding, AI Center) on top of its legacy RPA foundation, but its core architecture remains rule-based bots with visual scripting. It does not use neurosymbolic AI, cannot guarantee zero hallucination, and still requires RPA developers to build and maintain automations. Kognitos was built AI-native from the ground up with a patented neurosymbolic architecture.
UiPath bots rely on UI element selectors and visual scripting that break whenever an application updates its interface. Every UI change requires a developer to manually locate and fix the broken selector. Enterprises typically need dedicated RPA Centers of Excellence (CoEs) with multiple developers to keep bots running. Kognitos eliminates this with self-healing automations that auto-adapt, resulting in 12× lower maintenance costs.

Ready to move beyond
brittle RPA bots?

Book a demo and see Kognitos automate your actual process in plain English — no scripts, no selectors, no breakage.

Book Your Demo